Strict Standards: Non-static method phpbb_feed_factory::init() should not be called statically in /home/bigroadblues/bigroadblues.com/forum/feed.php on line 66
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 171: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:66)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 172: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:66)
Big Road Blues Discussion Forums 2003-10-09T03:15:49+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/feed.php?f=25&t=1819 2003-10-09T03:15:49+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1819&p=18347#p18347 <![CDATA[RE: PappyJ: Better Search Engine Pl]]>
From the read new list the link always sends me to the 1st page of the thread is there anyway for it to send you to the last...?

Just a suggestion

Statistics: Posted by blinds — Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:15 am


]]>
2003-09-29T02:02:04+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1819&p=18346#p18346 <![CDATA[RE: PappyJ: Better Search Engine Pl]]> >links to you and the title of the links.
>
>Most of the other search engines use Meta tags, but what's
>the point when you've got Google?

Indeed, Rusty, you're right on the ball. Meta tags used to be extremely important as far as search engine positioning went, but these days it's less of a factor. Too many folks with highly lucrative businesses to market discovered ways of seeding their meta tags with high-worth keywords to skew the actual content of their pages.

So, like you say, the trick is actually content and how many people link to your page. Of course, if we are discussing Google (the only search engine really worth discussing right now from a POV of a webmaster) then it's also the quality of sites linking to you.

Futile to have thousands of links to you if they're all cheap sites linking to you. Better to have a couple of dozen high quality (as ranked, pageranked, by Google) than thousands of disposable link sites.

As an example, Google only seems to show approximately [a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=+site%3Awww.bigroadblues.com+blues"]160 links[/a] to BRB in their index. We all know that there are actually thousands of pages of high quality blues content here at BRB, especially in the discussion forums. It's probably because the discussion board used at BRB creates links in a way that Google robots do not want to index and add to their search engine. It's a shame, because it means a lot of this wonderful content is simply invisible to most Internet searchers.

Again, content is key, but also making the content easily "findable", in particular by the major search engines.

eBuddha

Statistics: Posted by templeofblues — Mon Sep 29, 2003 2:02 am


]]>
2003-08-21T16:17:59+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1819&p=18348#p18348 <![CDATA[RE: PappyJ: Better Search Engine Pl]]> Regards,
PappyJ

Statistics: Posted by pappyj — Thu Aug 21, 2003 4:17 pm


]]>
2003-08-21T14:49:06+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1819&p=18345#p18345 <![CDATA[RE: PappyJ: Better Search Engine Pl]]>
Most of the other search engines use Meta tags, but what's the point when you've got Google?

ramble ramble ramble
I got ramblin' on my mind.

Statistics: Posted by rustyslide — Thu Aug 21, 2003 2:49 pm


]]>
2003-08-21T07:20:56+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1819&p=18344#p18344 <![CDATA[PappyJ: Better Search Engine Placem]]>
You could get better search engine placement if you added meta "description" and "keywords" tags inside the head of the coast2coastmusic web pages.

By better placement I mean searching google for "harmonica store" you could come up on page 1 rather than page 2.

Plus most search engine spiders grab the description and use it on the link, so it is what you want rather than just some text they grabbed from the middle of your page somewhere. Looks more professional that way too.

Just a thought.

Statistics: Posted by dfduck — Thu Aug 21, 2003 7:20 am


]]>