Strict Standards: Non-static method phpbb_feed_factory::init() should not be called statically in /home/bigroadblues/bigroadblues.com/forum/feed.php on line 66
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 171: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:66)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 172: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:66)
Big Road Blues Discussion Forums 2009-02-07T07:40:04+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/feed.php?f=13&t=9248 2009-02-07T07:40:04+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89934#p89934 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
www.myspace.com/shakeylyman

Statistics: Posted by bottleneck — Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:40 am


]]>
2009-02-04T15:26:36+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89767#p89767 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]> Statistics: Posted by jeffl — Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:26 pm


]]>
2009-02-04T06:28:05+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89751#p89751 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
jeffl wrote:

there's always a price to be paid for "cool" in the equipment world. [/quote]

bring it to the gig bungee corded to the back of a 1970 BMW R/75/5,then don't worry about cool.being that cool can be a burden,haha.

i hear you though.

http://www.myspace.com/shakeylyman

Statistics: Posted by bottleneck — Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:28 am


]]>
2009-02-02T22:15:23+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89616#p89616 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
bottleneck wrote:
for the money and size/weight issues,a pro junior makes more sense to me as a 15 watt option.plus i don't use reverb anyway.

http://www.myspace.com/shakeylyman
I don't use reverb either, and you're probably right about the relative value of the two amps, but there's always a price to be paid for "cool" in the equipment world. I don't like the hum of the Pro Jr., but that may be curable, and mebbe the Princeton hums too. The Princeton's pricey, no doubt. Pro Jr.s can be had pretty cheap on the used market, and there's alot of them out there.

Statistics: Posted by jeffl — Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:15 pm


]]>
2009-02-02T22:02:28+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89615#p89615 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
www.myspace.com/shakeylyman

Statistics: Posted by bottleneck — Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:02 pm


]]>
2009-02-02T04:46:18+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89517#p89517 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]> Statistics: Posted by songdog — Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:46 am


]]>
2009-01-31T20:47:48+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89458#p89458 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]> Statistics: Posted by watertore — Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:47 pm


]]>
2009-01-31T18:08:30+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89453#p89453 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]> Statistics: Posted by jeffl — Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:08 pm


]]>
2009-01-31T17:47:49+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89451#p89451 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=867098

Statistics: Posted by watertore — Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:47 pm


]]>
2009-01-31T14:58:47+00:00 http://www.bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9248&p=89441#p89441 <![CDATA[Re: Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue]]>
watertore wrote:
I bought one a few months ago. Everything with electric guitar on my site uses it. I love the amp. I haven't blown harp through it. All I have in the way of possible harp mics are a shure 57 and a ribbon. If you like later today I will blow something through it and post it. Walter
Walter, did you buy yours new or used? Yeah, I'll take a byte..you bet.

Statistics: Posted by jeffl — Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:58 pm


]]>